SOBRAN SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
Section 4(2) of the UP Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 protects only principal borrowers who have mortgaged their property; it does not extend to guarantors. Guarantors can be proceeded against for recovery even if the mortgaged property of the principal debtor has not been sold.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sobran Singh; Respondent: State of U.P. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Liability of Guarantor, Recovery as Arrears of Land Revenue, Interpretation of UP Public Moneys (recovery of Dues) Act, 1972
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sobran Singh
Appellant
State of U.P. & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 4(2) of the UP Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972, bars recovery proceedings against a guarantor until the mortgaged property of the principal borrower is sold
- 2 Whether guarantors are entitled to the same protection as principal borrowers under Section 4(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 4(2) of the UP Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 protects only principal borrowers who have mortgaged their property; it does not extend to guarantors. Guarantors can be proceeded against for recovery even if the mortgaged property of the principal debtor has not been sold.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed without any order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment