SHIVRAJ SINGH CHOUHAN & ORS. versus SPEAKER MADHYA PRADESH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY & ORS.
The Governor is constitutionally empowered to require a floor test in a running legislative assembly where, on objective and germane material, he forms a prima facie opinion that the Council of Ministers has lost the confidence of the House; such exercise is subject to judicial review for reasonableness and relevance of the material; the Governor did not usurp the Speaker’s exclusive domain over acceptance of resignations or disqualifications, and the pendency of Speaker proceedings is not a bar to convening a floor test; on the facts (22 purported resignations, acceptance of six ministerial resignations by the Speaker, and the Chief Minister’s own communication), the Governor’s direction...
- Parties
- Petitioner: Shivraj Singh Chouhan & Ors.; Respondent: Speaker, Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly; Petitioner: Madhya Pradesh Congress Legislature Party; Respondent: Governor of Madhya Pradesh; Respondent: Kamal Nath, Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Disposed
- Outcome
- Writ Petition No. 439 of 2020 disposed of; Writ Petition No. 449 of 2020 dismissed; operative directions issued
- Legal Topics
- Power of Governor to Summon and Prorogue, Floor Test (trust Vote), No Confidence Motion, Resignation of Members and Acceptance by Speaker, Tenth Schedule (anti Defection), Judicial Review of Constitutional Functionaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shivraj Singh Chouhan & Ors.
Petitioner
Speaker, Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly
Respondent
Madhya Pradesh Congress Legislature Party
Petitioner
Governor of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
Kamal Nath, Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Disposed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Governor can call for a trust vote in an already constituted (running) legislative assembly
- 2 Whether the Governor lawfully exercised the power to call a floor test in the facts of this case
- 3 Whether convening a floor test short-circuits the Speaker’s discretion under Article 190(3)(b) and the Tenth Schedule
Ratio Decidendi
The Governor is constitutionally empowered to require a floor test in a running legislative assembly where, on objective and germane material, he forms a prima facie opinion that the Council of Ministers has lost the confidence of the House; such exercise is subject to judicial review for reasonableness and relevance of the material; the Governor did not usurp the Speaker’s exclusive domain over acceptance of resignations or disqualifications, and the pendency of Speaker proceedings is not a bar to convening a floor test; on the facts (22 purported resignations, acceptance of six ministerial resignations by the Speaker, and the Chief Minister’s own communication), the Governor’s direction...
Court Disposition
Writ Petition No. 439 of 2020 disposed of; Writ Petition No. 449 of 2020 dismissed; operative directions issued
Orders
- Session of Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly reconvened on 20 March 2020
- Meeting confined to single agenda: whether the incumbent government enjoys the confidence of the House
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment