SUB-INSPECTOR SADHAN KUMAR GOSWAMI AND ORS. versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Supreme Court held that its prior judgment in Union of India v. S. Vijay Kumar & Ors. applies to all, regardless of whether the petitioners were parties to that case; special duty allowance is not payable to Group C and D employees, nor to Group A and B contrary to that judgment, and the law declared under Article 141 is binding on all. The petition is dismissed as petitioners cannot relitigate matters already settled by the Court, nor claim violation of Article 14, as the distinction made does not exist under the law. Government is permitted to recover amounts paid post-judgment, but not prior.
- Parties
- Petitioners: Sub-Inspector Sadhan Kumar Goswami and Ors.; Respondents: The Union of India and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (article 32) / Final Order/disposition
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Special Duty Allowance, Article 32 Writ Petition, Article 141 Binding Effect, Equal Pay Doctrine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sub-Inspector Sadhan Kumar Goswami and Ors.
Petitioners
The Union of India and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (article 32) / Final Order/disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Group C and D employees of SSB in the North Eastern Region are entitled to special duty allowance after Supreme Court's prior judgment
- 2 Whether non-parties to an earlier Supreme Court judgment are bound by it under Article 141
- 3 Whether denial of special duty allowance violates Article 14 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that its prior judgment in Union of India v. S. Vijay Kumar & Ors. applies to all, regardless of whether the petitioners were parties to that case; special duty allowance is not payable to Group C and D employees, nor to Group A and B contrary to that judgment, and the law declared under Article 141 is binding on all. The petition is dismissed as petitioners cannot relitigate matters already settled by the Court, nor claim violation of Article 14, as the distinction made does not exist under the law. Government is permitted to recover amounts paid post-judgment, but not prior.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed.
Orders
- Writ petition dismissed; petitioners are not entitled to special duty allowance.
- Only amounts paid after the date of the prior Supreme Court judgment may be recovered; amounts paid prior are not to be recovered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment