SRI AUROBJNDO ASHRAM TRUST AND ORS. versus R. RAMANATHAN AND ORS.
Failure of trustees to take steps to ban or condemn a book critical of the trust's spiritual guru does not constitute maladministration or breach of trust warranting their removal or the settling of a scheme for administration under Section 92 CPC; trustees are entitled to wide discretion unless the exercise of discretion is perverse.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust and Others; Respondent: R. Ramanathan and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order on Revocation of Leave to Sue Under Section 92 CPC
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Section 92 CPC, Removal of Trustees, Scheme for Administration of Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust and Others
Appellant
R. Ramanathan and Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order on Revocation of Leave to Sue Under Section 92 CPC
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to ban or condemn a book critical of the trust's spiritual guru constitutes maladministration justifying removal of trustees under Section 92 CPC
- 2 Whether suit for removal of trustees falls within the ambit of Section 92 CPC
Ratio Decidendi
Failure of trustees to take steps to ban or condemn a book critical of the trust's spiritual guru does not constitute maladministration or breach of trust warranting their removal or the settling of a scheme for administration under Section 92 CPC; trustees are entitled to wide discretion unless the exercise of discretion is perverse.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment and order of the High Court set aside
- Application for revocation of leave granted to initiate proceedings under Section 92 CPC allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment