SRI MARCEL MARTINS versus M. PRINTER & ORS.
The appellant held ostensible title to the property in a fiduciary capacity vis-a-vis the respondents, who contributed towards the sale consideration and continued to have interest in the property. Consequently, the sale transaction is saved from the prohibition of Section 4 of the Act by reason of Section 4(3)(b), and the suit filed by respondents is not barred.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sri Marcel Martins; Respondents: M. Printer and ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Benami Transactions, Fiduciary Capacity, Title to Immovable Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sri Marcel Martins
Appellant
M. Printer and ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale transaction in favour of the appellant is a benami transaction barred by Section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 or is saved by Section 4(3)(b) due to fiduciary capacity.
- 2 Whether respondents are entitled to declaration of co-ownership and injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant held ostensible title to the property in a fiduciary capacity vis-a-vis the respondents, who contributed towards the sale consideration and continued to have interest in the property. Consequently, the sale transaction is saved from the prohibition of Section 4 of the Act by reason of Section 4(3)(b), and the suit filed by respondents is not barred.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed without any order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment