SRI RAM SAHA versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

SRI RAM SAHA versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

There is no statutory requirement under Sections 4-B or 4-C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 for a raiyat (owner) of non-forest private garden/orchard land to obtain permission from the Collector to fell trees for the purpose of replacing them with new saplings, as mere felling of trees does not amount to diminishing the area, changing the character, or converting the land for another use as specified under those sections. The High Court was not justified in imposing restrictions and conditions for such felling, and courts cannot extend statutory provisions beyond their clear scope.

Parties
Appellant: Sri Ram Saha; Respondents: State of West Bengal and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
14 October 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Division Bench Judgment Dated 18.12.98 in W.p. No. 16280(w) of 1998
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Statutes, Land Use Regulations, Permissions for Felling Trees, Scope of Land Reforms Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sri Ram Saha

Appellant

State of West Bengal and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Division Bench Judgment Dated 18.12.98 in W.p. No. 16280(w) of 1998

  1. 1 Whether Sections 4-B and 4-C of West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 require owners of non-forest private plantation to obtain permission for felling old trees.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court was justified in imposing restrictions and conditions for felling of trees in such lands.

Ratio Decidendi

There is no statutory requirement under Sections 4-B or 4-C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 for a raiyat (owner) of non-forest private garden/orchard land to obtain permission from the Collector to fell trees for the purpose of replacing them with new saplings, as mere felling of trees does not amount to diminishing the area, changing the character, or converting the land for another use as specified under those sections. The High Court was not justified in imposing restrictions and conditions for such felling, and courts cannot extend statutory provisions beyond their clear scope.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Impugned judgment of the High Court imposing restrictions and conditions on the appellant for felling trees is set aside.
  • No permission is required for felling trees in non-forest private plantation/orchard/bagan.