SRI RAM SAHA versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
There is no statutory requirement under Sections 4-B or 4-C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 for a raiyat (owner) of non-forest private garden/orchard land to obtain permission from the Collector to fell trees for the purpose of replacing them with new saplings, as mere felling of trees does not amount to diminishing the area, changing the character, or converting the land for another use as specified under those sections. The High Court was not justified in imposing restrictions and conditions for such felling, and courts cannot extend statutory provisions beyond their clear scope.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sri Ram Saha; Respondents: State of West Bengal and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Division Bench Judgment Dated 18.12.98 in W.p. No. 16280(w) of 1998
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Statutes, Land Use Regulations, Permissions for Felling Trees, Scope of Land Reforms Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sri Ram Saha
Appellant
State of West Bengal and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Division Bench Judgment Dated 18.12.98 in W.p. No. 16280(w) of 1998
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sections 4-B and 4-C of West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 require owners of non-forest private plantation to obtain permission for felling old trees.
- 2 Whether the High Court was justified in imposing restrictions and conditions for felling of trees in such lands.
Ratio Decidendi
There is no statutory requirement under Sections 4-B or 4-C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 for a raiyat (owner) of non-forest private garden/orchard land to obtain permission from the Collector to fell trees for the purpose of replacing them with new saplings, as mere felling of trees does not amount to diminishing the area, changing the character, or converting the land for another use as specified under those sections. The High Court was not justified in imposing restrictions and conditions for such felling, and courts cannot extend statutory provisions beyond their clear scope.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment of the High Court imposing restrictions and conditions on the appellant for felling trees is set aside.
- No permission is required for felling trees in non-forest private plantation/orchard/bagan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment