S.S. LIGHT RAILWAY CO., LTD. versus UPPERDOAB SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ANOTHER

S.S. LIGHT RAILWAY CO., LTD. versus UPPERDOAB SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ANOTHER

Railway Rates Tribunal has no jurisdiction to investigate or reduce standardized terminal charges fixed by Central Government under s.32 of Indian Railways Act, and such charges are leviable for the mere provision of stations, sidings and other specified facilities, irrespective of their actual use by consignor.

Parties
Appellant: S.S. Light Railway Co., Ltd.; Respondent: Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd.; Respondent: Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd. & Another
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 February 1960
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against a Judgment and Order of Railway Rates Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Terminal Charges, Jurisdiction of Railway Rates Tribunal, Interpretation of Indian Railways Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S.S. Light Railway Co., Ltd.

Appellant

Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd.

Respondent

Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd. & Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against a Judgment and Order of Railway Rates Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the Railway Rates Tribunal has jurisdiction to investigate reasonableness of terminal charges fixed by Central Government under s.32 of Indian Railways Act
  2. 2 Whether terminal charges are leviable irrespective of actual user by consignor
  3. 3 Interpretation of 'terminals' as defined under s.3(14) of Indian Railways Act

Ratio Decidendi

Railway Rates Tribunal has no jurisdiction to investigate or reduce standardized terminal charges fixed by Central Government under s.32 of Indian Railways Act, and such charges are leviable for the mere provision of stations, sidings and other specified facilities, irrespective of their actual use by consignor.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of Tribunal set aside
  • Application under s.41 in respect of levying Rs.9.6 per 4 wheeler truck as terminal charge rejected