STANDARD CHARTERED BANK versus DHARMINDER BHOHI AND OTHERS
DRAT has no jurisdiction to grant general liberty to the auction purchaser to initiate action against the bank for any omission as such grant exceeds the limited statutory powers conferred; tribunals must act promptly and within the scope defined by SARFAESI and RDB Acts; delay and routine adjournments undermine the legislative object of speedy disposal, and the observation granting liberty to the auction purchaser is deleted.
- Parties
- Appellant: Standard Chartered Bank; Respondent No. 1: Dharminder Bhohi; Respondent No. 2: Unitech (developer); Respondent No. 3: Auction Purchaser (Respondent no. 3)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order Dated 16.07.2010 in Writ Petition (c) No. 4694 of 2010
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Delay in Disposal by DRT and DRAT, Adjournment Procedures, Jurisdiction and Powers of Drt/drat, SARFAESI Act, RDB Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Chartered Bank
Appellant
Dharminder Bhohi
Respondent No. 1
Unitech (developer)
Respondent No. 2
Auction Purchaser (Respondent no. 3)
Respondent No. 3
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order Dated 16.07.2010 in Writ Petition (c) No. 4694 of 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DRAT can grant 'liberty to initiate any action against the bank' to the auction purchaser
- 2 Extent of powers and jurisdiction of DRT/DRAT under SARFAESI Act and RDB Act
- 3 Object and procedure of SARFAESI Act and RDB Act
Ratio Decidendi
DRAT has no jurisdiction to grant general liberty to the auction purchaser to initiate action against the bank for any omission as such grant exceeds the limited statutory powers conferred; tribunals must act promptly and within the scope defined by SARFAESI and RDB Acts; delay and routine adjournments undermine the legislative object of speedy disposal, and the observation granting liberty to the auction purchaser is deleted.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Observation 'liberty is also given to the auction purchaser to file action against the bank for any omission committed by it' is deleted.
- Judgment of High Court declining to interfere with grant of liberty by DRAT is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment