STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LTD. versus DR. B.N. RAMAN
The Court upheld the factual findings that the deposit was not prematurely withdrawn and that the respondent is a consumer under the Act, but remitted to the State Commission to reconsider the appropriate date for exchange and rate of interest, noting that 18% interest is high and exchange rate was not examined.
- Parties
- Appellant: Standard Chartered Bank Ltd.; Respondent: Dr. B.N. Raman
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed and matter remitted to State Commission for reconsideration on rate of exchange and interest.
- Legal Topics
- Deficiency in Service, Foreign Currency Non Resident Accounts, Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Chartered Bank Ltd.
Appellant
Dr. B.N. Raman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was entitled to money decree for the FCNR deposit due to alleged deficiency in service by the bank
- 2 Whether the respondent qualifies as a consumer under Consumer Protection Act
- 3 Appropriate date for fixing rate of exchange and rate of interest in decree
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the factual findings that the deposit was not prematurely withdrawn and that the respondent is a consumer under the Act, but remitted to the State Commission to reconsider the appropriate date for exchange and rate of interest, noting that 18% interest is high and exchange rate was not examined.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed and matter remitted to State Commission for reconsideration on rate of exchange and interest.
Orders
- State Commission to reconsider date for fixing exchange rate and rate of interest in accordance with law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment