BHANU VALVE versus STATE

BHANU VALVE versus STATE

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition and upheld the convictions because the prosecutrix's evidence was found credible and the repeated rape of the daughter over five years, resulting in a child, constituted a barbaric and heinous offence that could not be condoned.

Parties
Petitioner: Bhanu Valve; Respondent: State
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Dismissed
Outcome
Special Leave Petition dismissed; convictions and orders of the courts below upheld.
Legal Topics
Rape, Credibility of Witness, Conviction on Appeal
Criminal Law Penal Code, 1860 Rape Credibility of Witness Conviction on Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bhanu Valve

Petitioner

State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape under Section 376 of the Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable
  2. 2 Whether the prosecutrix's (daughter's) evidence is credible and sufficient to uphold the conviction
  3. 3 Whether the nature of the offences justifies upholding the convictions by the courts below

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition and upheld the convictions because the prosecutrix's evidence was found credible and the repeated rape of the daughter over five years, resulting in a child, constituted a barbaric and heinous offence that could not be condoned.

Court Disposition

Special Leave Petition dismissed; convictions and orders of the courts below upheld.

Orders

  • Delay condoned.
  • Special Leave Petition dismissed.