STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) versus DHARAMPAL

STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) versus DHARAMPAL

Omission to put the contents of certificate to accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. does not ipso facto render conviction unsustainable unless prejudice is shown; appeals by State against acquittal must be filed within 90 days under Article 114(a) Limitation Act, not 60 days as per Section 378(5) Cr.P.C., which applies...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: State (Delhi Administration); Respondent: Dharampal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Acquittal Judgment of Sessions Judge and Delhi High Court
Outcome
Appeals allowed. Impugned judgments/orders of High Court and Sessions Judge set aside. Appeals restored to Sessions Judge for disposal on merits.
Legal Topics
Effect of Omission to Put Inculpatory Material to Accused, Appeal Against Acquittal, Limitation for Criminal Appeals, Section 313 Cr.p.c. Procedure, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act
Criminal Law Food Safety Law Procedural Law Effect of Omission to Put Inculpatory Material to Accused Appeal Against Acquittal Limitation for Criminal Appeals Section 313 Cr.p.c. Procedure Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State (Delhi Administration)

Appellant

Dharampal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Acquittal Judgment of Sessions Judge and Delhi High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does omission to bring to accused’s attention an inculpatory material ipso facto vitiate the criminal trial?
  2. 2 What is the period of limitation for State Government appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C.?
  3. 3 Whether High Court erred in dismissing appeals as time-barred under Section 378(5) Cr.P.C.?

Ratio Decidendi

Omission to put the contents of certificate to accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. does not ipso facto render conviction unsustainable unless prejudice is shown; appeals by State against acquittal must be filed within 90 days under Article 114(a) Limitation Act, not 60 days as per Section 378(5) Cr.P.C., which applies only to complainant's special leave application.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed. Impugned judgments/orders of High Court and Sessions Judge set aside. Appeals restored to Sessions Judge for disposal on merits.

Orders

  • Impugned Judgment dated 20th November, 2000 and Orders of the Sessions Judge set aside.
  • Appeals restored to file of Additional District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi for disposal on merits.