STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH versus RAYAVARAPU PUNNAYYA & ANOTHER

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH versus RAYAVARAPU PUNNAYYA & ANOTHER

Where the accused intentionally inflicts multiple injuries that are cumulatively sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, the offence amounts to 'murder' under Section 300 (Thirdly) IPC, even if none of the injuries individually is sufficient to cause death, and there is no direct evidence of intention to cause death. The High Court erred in altering the conviction to Section 304 Part II. The order of the trial court convicting for murder under Section 302 is restored.

Parties
Appellant: State of Andhra Pradesh; Respondents: Rayavarapu Punnayya & Another
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
15 September 1976
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Special Leave / Appeal From Judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos. 26 and 27/69 Dated 27 7 1970
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Conviction for murder (Section 302 IPC) restored.
Legal Topics
Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder, Murder, Distinction Between Sections 299 and 300, IPC, Section 300 Thirdly, Mens Rea in Murder Cases
Criminal Law Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder Murder Distinction Between Sections 299 and 300, IPC Section 300 Thirdly, IPC Mens Rea in Murder Cases

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Andhra Pradesh

Appellant

Rayavarapu Punnayya & Another

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal by Special Leave / Appeal From Judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos. 26 and 27/69 Dated 27 7 1970

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the distinction between 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' and 'murder' under the Indian Penal Code?
  2. 2 Whether the offence falls under Section 300 Thirdly, IPC, or under a lesser provision given the facts of the case?

Ratio Decidendi

Where the accused intentionally inflicts multiple injuries that are cumulatively sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, the offence amounts to 'murder' under Section 300 (Thirdly) IPC, even if none of the injuries individually is sufficient to cause death, and there is no direct evidence of intention to cause death. The High Court erred in altering the conviction to Section 304 Part II. The order of the trial court convicting for murder under Section 302 is restored.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Conviction for murder (Section 302 IPC) restored.

Orders

  • Order of trial court convicting the accused (Respondent 2) for murder with life imprisonment restored.
  • Respondent 2 to be arrested and committed to prison to serve the sentence if not already in jail.