M. NIRMALA & ORS. versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
Temporary employees appointed on a stop-gap basis and exempted from qualifying examinations cannot claim seniority from dates of their appointments after April 1974. Seniority must be computed from dates of regular appointments made through the Public Service Commission qualifying test, as upheld by the Administrative Tribunal and supported by General Rule 33(a) and G.O.Ms. No. 647.
- Parties
- Petitioner: M. Nirmala; Respondent: State of Andhra Pradesh; Petitioner: K.R. Chaudhary; Petitioner: Miss Malini Poduval; Petitioner: Miss R. George; Respondent: M.K. Ramamurthy; Respondent: T.V.S.N. Chari; Respondent: Miss V. Grover; Respondent: A. Subba Rao
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition and Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition and appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Seniority Computation, Regularisation of Temporary Employees, Service Commission Appointments, Exemption From Qualifying Examination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. Nirmala
Petitioner
State of Andhra Pradesh
Respondent
K.R. Chaudhary
Petitioner
Miss Malini Poduval
Petitioner
Miss R. George
Petitioner
M.K. Ramamurthy
Respondent
T.V.S.N. Chari
Respondent
Miss V. Grover
Respondent
A. Subba Rao
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition and Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether seniority of temporary employees exempted from qualifying examinations and whose posts were withdrawn from Public Service Commission purview should be computed from dates of their appointments after April 1974 and above Service Commission candidates
Ratio Decidendi
Temporary employees appointed on a stop-gap basis and exempted from qualifying examinations cannot claim seniority from dates of their appointments after April 1974. Seniority must be computed from dates of regular appointments made through the Public Service Commission qualifying test, as upheld by the Administrative Tribunal and supported by General Rule 33(a) and G.O.Ms. No. 647.
Court Disposition
Petition and appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment