STATE OF ASSAM versus JITENDRA KUMAR SENAPATI & OTHERS
By accepting the quantified sum within the stipulated time, the respondents relinquished all future claims to interest, and did not expressly reserve a right to claim it; therefore, no interest is payable under section 34 of the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Assam; Respondent: Jitendra Kumar Senapati & Others; Respondent: V. S. Desai; Respondent: B. P. Maheshwari; Respondent: Suresh Sethi; Respondent: Miss Asha Jain
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate Under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution of India From a Judgment of the Gauhati High Court in Civil Rule No. 1151/69
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Compensation, Interpretation of Settlement Agreements, Sections 23 and 34 Land Acquisition Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Assam
Appellant
Jitendra Kumar Senapati & Others
Respondent
V. S. Desai
Respondent
B. P. Maheshwari
Respondent
Suresh Sethi
Respondent
Miss Asha Jain
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate Under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution of India From a Judgment of the Gauhati High Court in Civil Rule No. 1151/69
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement to accept a specified compensation sum excluded further claims for interest under section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act
Ratio Decidendi
By accepting the quantified sum within the stipulated time, the respondents relinquished all future claims to interest, and did not expressly reserve a right to claim it; therefore, no interest is payable under section 34 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court set aside
- Respondents' petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment