STATE OF BIHAR versus UMA SHANKAR KETRIWAL & OTHERS
The protraction of criminal proceedings for over 20 years without substantial progress constitutes harassment to the accused and is an abuse of process, warranting quashing of the proceedings regardless of the seriousness of the allegations.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Bihar; Respondents: Uma Shankar Ketriwal & Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Delay in Trial, Quashing of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Bihar
Appellant
Uma Shankar Ketriwal & Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether criminal proceedings continuing since 1963 amounted to abuse of process due to delay
- 2 Whether the High Court was justified in quashing proceedings despite allegations disclosing an offence
Ratio Decidendi
The protraction of criminal proceedings for over 20 years without substantial progress constitutes harassment to the accused and is an abuse of process, warranting quashing of the proceedings regardless of the seriousness of the allegations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment