SHRI KRISHNA GYANODAY SUGAR LTD. AND ANR. versus STATE OF BIHAR
The Bihar Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1985 is valid and within the legislative competence of the State under Entry 42, List III. Section 4(4)(ii)(e) validly annuls transfers of distilleries after 29.10.1978. Distilleries inter-connected with sugar undertakings are subject to acquisition. Compensation provisions under Section 7 are adequate. Retrospective operation of the Act is not arbitrary or confiscatory, and objections based on overlap, valuation, or constitutional provisions (Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 31) are rejected.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Shri Krishna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd.; Petitioner: United Distilleries (P) Ltd.; Respondent: State of Bihar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petitions and Transferred Cases / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed. Transfer cases disposed of as infructuous. Contempt proceedings dropped. Special Leave Petition delinked.
- Legal Topics
- Acquisition and Transfer of Sugar Undertakings, Validity of State Legislation, Legislative Competence Under Entry 42 of List III, Retrospective Operation of Statutes, Compensation for Acquisition, Overlap Between State and Central Enactments, Acquisition Vs Regulation of Industries, Inclusion of Distilleries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shri Krishna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd.
Petitioner
United Distilleries (P) Ltd.
Petitioner
State of Bihar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petitions and Transferred Cases / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Bihar Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1985 is within legislative competence of State and valid
- 2 Whether Section 4(4)(ii)(e) applies retrospectively to nullify transfers of distilleries effected after 29.10.1978
- 3 Whether acquisition of distillery is valid and included in sugar undertaking
Ratio Decidendi
The Bihar Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1985 is valid and within the legislative competence of the State under Entry 42, List III. Section 4(4)(ii)(e) validly annuls transfers of distilleries after 29.10.1978. Distilleries inter-connected with sugar undertakings are subject to acquisition. Compensation provisions under Section 7 are adequate. Retrospective operation of the Act is not arbitrary or confiscatory, and objections based on overlap, valuation, or constitutional provisions (Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 31) are rejected.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed. Transfer cases disposed of as infructuous. Contempt proceedings dropped. Special Leave Petition delinked.
Orders
- Writ petitions stand dismissed.
- Transfer Cases Nos. 26/85 and 66/99 disposed of as infructuous.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment