STATE OF BIHAR versus RAMESHWAR PRATAP NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS.
The Bihar Land Reforms Amendment Act, 1959, as it amends the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 with retrospective effect, is a law providing for acquisition of rights in an estate within Article 31A of the Constitution. Even if inconsistent with Articles 14, 19, and 31, it is protected and not void. The legislative competence existed under Article 246. Rights to hold melas are rights in land and thus protected under Article 31A.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Bihar; Respondents: Rameshwar Pratap Narain Singh and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal and Petitions Under Article 32 / Final Judgment on Validity of Amending Legislation
- Outcome
- Appeals by the State allowed. Civil Appeal No. 574 of 1960 and petitions under Article 32 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Fundamental Rights, Legislative Competence, Acquisition of Property, Retrospective Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Bihar
Appellant
Rameshwar Pratap Narain Singh and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal and Petitions Under Article 32 / Final Judgment on Validity of Amending Legislation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bihar Land Reforms Amendment Act, 1959, as it amends the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 with retrospective effect, violates Articles 14, 19, and 31 of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the Bihar Legislature had legislative competence to enact the amendment under Article 246 of the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the amending legislation is protected by Article 31A as a law providing for acquisition of rights in an estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The Bihar Land Reforms Amendment Act, 1959, as it amends the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 with retrospective effect, is a law providing for acquisition of rights in an estate within Article 31A of the Constitution. Even if inconsistent with Articles 14, 19, and 31, it is protected and not void. The legislative competence existed under Article 246. Rights to hold melas are rights in land and thus protected under Article 31A.
Court Disposition
Appeals by the State allowed. Civil Appeal No. 574 of 1960 and petitions under Article 32 dismissed.
Orders
- The orders of the High Court issuing writs in favour of the applicants are set aside.
- Applications under Article 226 made before the High Court are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment