LALIT NARAYAN MISHRA INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL CHANGE, PATNA, ETC. versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ETC.

LALIT NARAYAN MISHRA INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL CHANGE, PATNA, ETC. versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ETC.

The Bihar Private Educational Institutions (Taking Over) Act, 1987 and related Ordinances are constitutionally valid; the phased approach to nationalisation is legitimate and non-discriminatory. The right to form association under Article 19(1)(c) was not infringed. The Act is within State legislative competence under Entry 42 List III. The termination of the Registrar, Dr. Jagadanand Jha, without opportunity of being heard, violated principles of natural justice and is unsustainable.

Parties
Petitioner: Lalit Narayan Mishra Institute of Economic Development and Social Change, Patna; Petitioner: Dr. Jagadanand Jha; Respondent: State of Bihar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
23 March 1988
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) and Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Partly allowed, partly dismissed.
Legal Topics
Nationalisation of Educational Institutions, Acquisition of Property, Fundamental Rights – Right to Association, Legislative Competence, Principles of Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lalit Narayan Mishra Institute of Economic Development and Social Change, Patna

Petitioner

Dr. Jagadanand Jha

Petitioner

State of Bihar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) and Civil Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Validity of Bihar Private Educational Institutions (Taking Over) Act, 1987 and related Ordinances
  2. 2 Violation of Article 14 – Discrimination
  3. 3 Violation of Article 19(1)(c) – Right to Association

Ratio Decidendi

The Bihar Private Educational Institutions (Taking Over) Act, 1987 and related Ordinances are constitutionally valid; the phased approach to nationalisation is legitimate and non-discriminatory. The right to form association under Article 19(1)(c) was not infringed. The Act is within State legislative competence under Entry 42 List III. The termination of the Registrar, Dr. Jagadanand Jha, without opportunity of being heard, violated principles of natural justice and is unsustainable.

Court Disposition

Partly allowed, partly dismissed.

Orders

  • Impugned order dated April 21,1986 terminating Dr. Jagadanand Jha’s services is quashed.
  • State Government at liberty to reconsider termination with opportunity to be heard for Dr. Jha.