STATE OF BIHAR & ORS versus ARBIND

STATE OF BIHAR & ORS versus ARBIND

There is no rule requiring a suspended employee to remain at headquarters for entitlement to subsistence allowance. Non-payment of subsistence allowance and salary caused prejudice and handicapped respondent's ability to participate in departmental proceedings, violating principles of natural justice. Quashing of dismissal and fresh inquiry after payment was justified.

Parties
Appellant: State of Bihar & Ors; Respondent: Arbind
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal disposed of
Legal Topics
Subsistence Allowance, Suspension, Disciplinary Proceedings, Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Bihar & Ors

Appellant

Arbind

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether subsistence allowance can be withheld for not staying at headquarters during suspension
  2. 2 Whether non-payment of salary and subsistence allowance vitiates disciplinary proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

There is no rule requiring a suspended employee to remain at headquarters for entitlement to subsistence allowance. Non-payment of subsistence allowance and salary caused prejudice and handicapped respondent's ability to participate in departmental proceedings, violating principles of natural justice. Quashing of dismissal and fresh inquiry after payment was justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal disposed of

Orders

  • Full salary from 1.1.1996 till date of suspension (26.6.1997) to be paid.
  • Subsistence allowance from 25.6.1997 till 13.9.2000 to be paid at rate of 50% salary.