STATE OF BIHAR & ORS versus ARBIND
There is no rule requiring a suspended employee to remain at headquarters for entitlement to subsistence allowance. Non-payment of subsistence allowance and salary caused prejudice and handicapped respondent's ability to participate in departmental proceedings, violating principles of natural justice. Quashing of dismissal and fresh inquiry after payment was justified.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Bihar & Ors; Respondent: Arbind
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Subsistence Allowance, Suspension, Disciplinary Proceedings, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Bihar & Ors
Appellant
Arbind
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subsistence allowance can be withheld for not staying at headquarters during suspension
- 2 Whether non-payment of salary and subsistence allowance vitiates disciplinary proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
There is no rule requiring a suspended employee to remain at headquarters for entitlement to subsistence allowance. Non-payment of subsistence allowance and salary caused prejudice and handicapped respondent's ability to participate in departmental proceedings, violating principles of natural justice. Quashing of dismissal and fresh inquiry after payment was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of
Orders
- Full salary from 1.1.1996 till date of suspension (26.6.1997) to be paid.
- Subsistence allowance from 25.6.1997 till 13.9.2000 to be paid at rate of 50% salary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment