GOVERDHAN LAL DHAWAN versus STATE OF BIHAR & OTHERS
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 does not require a prior agreement between Regional Transport Authorities before granting an inter-regional stage carriage permit; permits can be issued by the Authority having jurisdiction under section 45, but such permits must be countersigned by the Authority of the other region under section 63 to be valid in that region. The absence of a rule or provision requiring prior agreement means the application for a permit can be considered without such agreement. Accordingly, the High Court rightly dismissed the writ petition.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Goverdhan Lal Dhawan; Respondent: State of Bihar & Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Patna High Court
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Motor Vehicles Permits, Inter Regional Stage Carriage Permits, Jurisdiction of Regional Transport Authorities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goverdhan Lal Dhawan
Petitioner
State of Bihar & Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Patna High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a prior agreement between two or more Regional Transport Authorities of regions through which an inter-regional route passes is necessary before any one of them may grant a permit to ply a stage carriage on such route under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
Ratio Decidendi
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 does not require a prior agreement between Regional Transport Authorities before granting an inter-regional stage carriage permit; permits can be issued by the Authority having jurisdiction under section 45, but such permits must be countersigned by the Authority of the other region under section 63 to be valid in that region. The absence of a rule or provision requiring prior agreement means the application for a permit can be considered without such agreement. Accordingly, the High Court rightly dismissed the writ petition.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Special Leave Petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment