STATE OF BIHAR versus DHIRENDRA KUMAR AND ORS.
Civil suits challenging land acquisition proceedings are not maintainable once possession is taken under the Land Acquisition Act, and civil courts cannot issue injunctions in such cases; only High Court under Article 226 can entertain such matters.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Bihar; Respondent: Dhirendra Kumar and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Patna High Court Judgment Dated 7.2.1986 in Misc. Appeal No. 16 of 1986
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders of trial court and High Court are set aside without costs.
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Civil Suit Post Land Acquisition, Jurisdiction of Civil Court, Ad Interim Injunction in Land Acquisition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Bihar
Appellant
Dhirendra Kumar and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Patna High Court Judgment Dated 7.2.1986 in Misc. Appeal No. 16 of 1986
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a civil suit is maintainable after land acquisition proceedings and possession taken are complete
- 2 Whether ad interim injunction could be issued against dispossession after land acquired under Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Ratio Decidendi
Civil suits challenging land acquisition proceedings are not maintainable once possession is taken under the Land Acquisition Act, and civil courts cannot issue injunctions in such cases; only High Court under Article 226 can entertain such matters.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders of trial court and High Court are set aside without costs.
Orders
- Orders of trial court granting injunction and High Court confirming status quo are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment