REV. SIDHAJBHAI SABHAI AND OTHERS versus STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER
The rules and government orders compelling reservation of 80% seats for government nominees and threatening withdrawal of grants and recognition infringe the fundamental freedom under Article 30(1); this right is not subject to restrictions conceived in the interest of the public or nation as a whole, but only...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rev. Sidhajbhai Sabhai and Others; Respondent: State of Bombay and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Fundamental Rights, Minority Rights, Educational Institutions, Right to Establish and Administer Institutions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rev. Sidhajbhai Sabhai and Others
Petitioner
State of Bombay and Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether government-mandated reservation of seats in a minority-run educational institution infringes the fundamental right under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India.
- 2 Whether rules requiring reservation and threat of withdrawal of recognition/grants violate rights under Articles 30(1), 26(a)-(d), and 19(1)(f) & (g).
Ratio Decidendi
The rules and government orders compelling reservation of 80% seats for government nominees and threatening withdrawal of grants and recognition infringe the fundamental freedom under Article 30(1); this right is not subject to restrictions conceived in the interest of the public or nation as a whole, but only regulations directed to the educational character and effectiveness of the institution are permissible.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed.
Orders
- Writ issued in terms of prayers (a), (b), (c), and (d) insofar as they relate to reservation of seats under government orders, with modification that reference to Rule 12 in the prayers is deleted.
- Petitioners entitled to costs of the petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment