PROF. YASHPAL AND ANR. versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS.
Sections 5 and 6 of the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002, which allowed the State Government to establish universities by mere executive notification without legislative scrutiny, necessary infrastructure, or compliance with minimum standards, are ultra vires the Constitution. Such provisions and the resulting private universities are a fraud on the Constitution, as they bypass the coordination and determination of standards reserved for Parliament and UGC, and compromise the standard and credibility of higher education and degrees. The entire process subverts the constitutional framework for universities and is therefore invalid; all such...
- Parties
- Petitioner: Prof. Yashpal; Respondent: State of Chhattisgarh; Respondent: University Grants Commission (UGC); Petitioners/respondents: Private Universities (through various writ petitions, appeals)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) and Appeals / Final Decision and Disposal by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Writ Petitions (C) No. 19 of 2004 and No. 565 of 2003 are allowed. Sections 5 and 6 of the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 are declared ultra vires and struck down. All notifications establishing private universities under these provisions (including respondent...
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence Regarding Universities, Validity of State Law Establishing Private Universities, Coordination and Determination of Standards in Higher Education, Role and Powers of UGC, Recognition of Degrees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prof. Yashpal
Petitioner
State of Chhattisgarh
Respondent
University Grants Commission (UGC)
Respondent
Private Universities (through various writ petitions, appeals)
Petitioners/respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) and Appeals / Final Decision and Disposal by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sections 5 and 6 of the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 are ultra vires the Constitution
- 2 Legislative competence of State vs Parliament regarding universities and higher education standards
- 3 Validity and constitutional status of private universities established by executive notification without necessary standards or regulation
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 5 and 6 of the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002, which allowed the State Government to establish universities by mere executive notification without legislative scrutiny, necessary infrastructure, or compliance with minimum standards, are ultra vires the Constitution. Such provisions and the resulting private universities are a fraud on the Constitution, as they bypass the coordination and determination of standards reserved for Parliament and UGC, and compromise the standard and credibility of higher education and degrees. The entire process subverts the constitutional framework for universities and is therefore invalid; all such...
Court Disposition
Writ Petitions (C) No. 19 of 2004 and No. 565 of 2003 are allowed. Sections 5 and 6 of the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 are declared ultra vires and struck down. All notifications establishing private universities under these provisions (including respondent...
Orders
- Steps to be taken to affiliate bona fide institutions established by such struck-down universities to existing State Universities, subject to fulfilment of requisite norms and standards.
- Technical, medical, and other professional institutions to be affiliated only if established in compliance with the standards prescribed by respective regulatory statutory bodies (AICTE, MCI, DCI, etc.) with their approval or sanction as required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment