STATE OF GOA versus M/S. WESTERN BUILDERS
Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to proceedings under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; there is no express provision excluding its operation. The period spent bona fide pursuing remedy in a court without jurisdiction may be excluded in computing limitation for filing an application to set aside an arbitral award.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Goa; Respondent: M/s. Western Builders
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Applicability of Limitation Act to Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Exclusion of Limitation Act Provisions, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Goa
Appellant
M/s. Western Builders
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applicable to proceedings under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
- 2 Does section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act exclude section 14 of the Limitation Act?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to proceedings under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; there is no express provision excluding its operation. The period spent bona fide pursuing remedy in a court without jurisdiction may be excluded in computing limitation for filing an application to set aside an arbitral award.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Judgments/orders of courts below are set aside.
- Cases remanded to Trial/District Court to decide application under section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 on merits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment