STATE OF GUJARAT versus JAMNADAS G. PABRI AND ORS. ETC.

STATE OF GUJARAT versus JAMNADAS G. PABRI AND ORS. ETC.

Once a reasonable nexus is established between governmental satisfaction and disturbances making it inexpedient to hold elections, the court cannot interfere; the precondition for issuance of notification under s. 303A was objectively fulfilled and powers not exercised maliciously or for extraneous considerations.

Parties
Appellant: State of Gujarat; Respondents: Jamnadas G. Pabri and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 October 1974
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment From High Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Statutes, Exercise of Emergency Powers, Panchayat Term Extension, Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Gujarat

Appellant

Jamnadas G. Pabri and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment From High Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether the condition precedent to issuance of notification under s. 303A of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 was satisfied
  2. 2 Construction of the expression 'by reason of disturbances', 'to hold elections', and 'expedient' in s. 303A
  3. 3 Whether the government exercised power for extraneous reasons

Ratio Decidendi

Once a reasonable nexus is established between governmental satisfaction and disturbances making it inexpedient to hold elections, the court cannot interfere; the precondition for issuance of notification under s. 303A was objectively fulfilled and powers not exercised maliciously or for extraneous considerations.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The judgment and order of the Gujarat High Court dated 26th June, 1974 are set aside.
  • Parties to bear their own costs throughout.