STATE OF GUJARAT versus JAMNADAS G. PABRI AND ORS. ETC.
Once a reasonable nexus is established between governmental satisfaction and disturbances making it inexpedient to hold elections, the court cannot interfere; the precondition for issuance of notification under s. 303A was objectively fulfilled and powers not exercised maliciously or for extraneous considerations.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Gujarat; Respondents: Jamnadas G. Pabri and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Statutes, Exercise of Emergency Powers, Panchayat Term Extension, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Gujarat
Appellant
Jamnadas G. Pabri and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the condition precedent to issuance of notification under s. 303A of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 was satisfied
- 2 Construction of the expression 'by reason of disturbances', 'to hold elections', and 'expedient' in s. 303A
- 3 Whether the government exercised power for extraneous reasons
Ratio Decidendi
Once a reasonable nexus is established between governmental satisfaction and disturbances making it inexpedient to hold elections, the court cannot interfere; the precondition for issuance of notification under s. 303A was objectively fulfilled and powers not exercised maliciously or for extraneous considerations.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The judgment and order of the Gujarat High Court dated 26th June, 1974 are set aside.
- Parties to bear their own costs throughout.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment