STATE OF GUJARAT versus M/S. ARVIND MILLS AND ORS.

STATE OF GUJARAT versus M/S. ARVIND MILLS AND ORS.

The proviso to Rule 81(2) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 as amended, which imposes double assessment for non-use of land for permitted non-agricultural purposes, is beyond the powers conferred by the parent Act because Section 48 only authorizes assessment with reference to use and not non-use of land. The provision is also arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution; actions for breach of land use permissions should be taken under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, not via land revenue rules.

Parties
Appellant: State of Gujarat; Respondents: M/s. Arvind Mills and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal From Order of Gujarat High Court
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Land Revenue, Urban Land Ceiling, Rule Making Powers, Retrospective Legislation, Equality Before Law (article 14)
Land Law Constitutional Law Land Revenue Urban Land Ceiling Rule Making Powers Retrospective Legislation Equality Before Law (article 14)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Gujarat

Appellant

M/s. Arvind Mills and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal From Order of Gujarat High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proviso to Rule 81(2) of the Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 as amended by Gujarat Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 1977 is valid.
  2. 2 Whether land revenue can be levied at double the rates for non-compliance of conditions under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
  3. 3 Whether the rule is ultra vires Section 48 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 and/or violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The proviso to Rule 81(2) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 as amended, which imposes double assessment for non-use of land for permitted non-agricultural purposes, is beyond the powers conferred by the parent Act because Section 48 only authorizes assessment with reference to use and not non-use of land. The provision is also arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution; actions for breach of land use permissions should be taken under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, not via land revenue rules.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Proviso to Rule 81(2) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 (as amended) struck down.
  • No order as to costs.