STATE OF GUJARAT versus NAVINBHAI CHANDRAKANT JOSHI (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 2597 OF 2018)
The conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is modified to conviction under Section 8 of the Act based on recovery of bribe amount and anthracene powder from respondent no.1, who is not a Government servant.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Gujarat; Respondent/applicant/accused No.2: Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application in Criminal Appeal / Modification of Prior Judgment
- Outcome
- earlier judgment modified
- Legal Topics
- Judgment Modification, Prevention of Corruption Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Gujarat
Appellant
Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi
Respondent/applicant/accused No.2
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application in Criminal Appeal / Modification of Prior Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent/accused no.2 was correctly described as a Government servant in the prior judgment.
- 2 Whether conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was proper given the facts.
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is modified to conviction under Section 8 of the Act based on recovery of bribe amount and anthracene powder from respondent no.1, who is not a Government servant.
Court Disposition
earlier judgment modified
Orders
- Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 changed to conviction under Section 8 of the Act.
- Sentence reduced from one year to six months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment