DHARAM VEER SINGH AND ORS. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
The writ petition filed by tenure-holders not party before the High Court challenging the Consolidation Scheme has no merit and stands dismissed following dismissal of the Civil Appeal on the same issue.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: DHARAM VEER SINGH AND ORS.; Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (c) No. 413 of 2003 / Original Jurisdiction, Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Writ petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Consolidation Scheme, Shamlat Deh Land
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DHARAM VEER SINGH AND ORS.
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (c) No. 413 of 2003 / Original Jurisdiction, Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Consolidation Scheme affecting Shamlat Deh lands as challenged by tenure-holders not party before the High Court warrants intervention by the Supreme Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The writ petition filed by tenure-holders not party before the High Court challenging the Consolidation Scheme has no merit and stands dismissed following dismissal of the Civil Appeal on the same issue.
Court Disposition
Writ petition dismissed
Orders
- Writ Petition dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
A
B
DHARAM VEER SINGH AND ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2005
[B.P. SINGH AND S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.]
Land Laws and Agricultural Tenancy :
Consolidation scheme-Framed in regard to Sham/at Deh Land- c Tenure-holders affected filing writ petition in High Court and later appeal* in Supreme Court-Some of the tenure-holders who were not parties before High Court, filing writ petition in Supreme Court-Held, Civil Appeal having been dismissed, writ petition also dismissed as devoid of merits.
*Bhagirath Singh & Anr. v. State of Haryana and Anr., [2005) 7 SCC
556, referred to.
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (C) No. 413 of2003.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
S.K. Verma for the Petitioners.
Ajay Siwach, Pardeep Dahya and T.V. George for the Respondents.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
D
E
F
B.P. SINGH, J.: This Writ Petition has been filed by some of the land holders who are affected by the Consolidation Scheme framed in regard to Shamlat Deh lands of the concerned villages: The said scheme was challenged by some other proprietors and co-sharers in Civil Writ Petition No. 18310 of G 1998 before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The said writ petition having been dismissed, Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000 was preferred before this Court by Special Leave. Dispite the order of status-quo granted by this Court pending the appeal, the petitioners alleged that they were before displaced since they were not parties in the writ petition filed before
H the High Court.
',k
1180
,
~
""-
~
DHARAM VEER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA [B.P. SINGH, J.] 1181
They, therefore, filed the instant writ petition which has been heard A
along with civil Appeal No. 646 of of 2000.
We have delivered our judgment today dismissing the Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000. We find no merit in this writ petition filed by the petitioners and the same is accordingly dismissed.
B
R.P.
Appeal dismissed.
- -
...