BHAGWAN DASS AND OTHERS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
Temporary or scheme-based appointment cannot justify discrimination in pay or denial of increments when nature of duties performed is equivalent to regular cadre; petitioners entitled to same pay scale as regular supervisors from date of writ petition, ignoring service breaks given for scheme reasons.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Bhagwan Dass and others; Respondent: State of Haryana & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay for Equal Work, Temporary Employment, Article 14, Article 16
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhagwan Dass and others
Petitioner
State of Haryana & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether temporary supervisors are entitled to equal pay as regular supervisors under the 'equal work equal pay' doctrine
- 2 Whether breaks in service due to scheme's temporary nature justify denial of benefits available to regular employees
Ratio Decidendi
Temporary or scheme-based appointment cannot justify discrimination in pay or denial of increments when nature of duties performed is equivalent to regular cadre; petitioners entitled to same pay scale as regular supervisors from date of writ petition, ignoring service breaks given for scheme reasons.
Court Disposition
Petition partly allowed
Orders
- Petitioners to be fixed in same pay scale as regular supervisors (respondents 2-6).
- Pay of each petitioner to be fixed from date of initial appointment, disregarding breaks in service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment