SYED T.A. NAQSHBANDI AND ORS. versus STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

SYED T.A. NAQSHBANDI AND ORS. versus STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

Grant of selection grade and super-time scale to certain officers was made as per statutory rules and guidelines of the High Court, which are neither arbitrary nor illegal or irrational; Judicial review is limited to the process, not the merits, and no infirmity was shown in the challenged proceedings....

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Petitioner: SYED T.A. NAQSHBANDI AND ORS.; Respondent: STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 354 of 2002 / Final Judgment on Merits
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Selection Grade and Super Time Scale, Judicial Review, Grant of Selection Grade, Higher Judicial Service Rules
Service Law Constitutional Law Selection Grade and Super Time Scale Judicial Review Grant of Selection Grade Higher Judicial Service Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SYED T.A. NAQSHBANDI AND ORS.

Petitioner

STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) No. 354 of 2002 / Final Judgment on Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether grant of selection grade and super-time scale to certain judicial officers was arbitrary, illegal, or unconstitutional
  2. 2 Whether criteria and guidelines for grant of such grades by Full Court and Committee violate principles under Article 16
  3. 3 Whether Shetty Commission recommendations are binding without being implemented in service rules

Ratio Decidendi

Grant of selection grade and super-time scale to certain officers was made as per statutory rules and guidelines of the High Court, which are neither arbitrary nor illegal or irrational; Judicial review is limited to the process, not the merits, and no infirmity was shown in the challenged proceedings. Recommendations of the Shetty Commission are not binding unless incorporated into service rules. Challenge fails as the proceedings are not vitiated to warrant interference.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petition dismissed without costs.
  • All unwarranted remarks and allegations are expunged from the record as per judgment.