G. M. SHAH versus STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR
The grounds mentioned for the detention did not fall within the statutory meaning of 'acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State'. The order of detention was made only with reference to 'public order', and the supporting grounds referred to both 'public order' and 'security of the State', rendering the detention order illegal.
- Parties
- Petitioner: G. M. Shah; Respondent: State of Jammu & Kashmir
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution / Supreme Court Final Decision, Original Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; detention order quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Public Safety Act, Preventive Detention, Law and Order, Public Order, Security of the State
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G. M. Shah
Petitioner
State of Jammu & Kashmir
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution / Supreme Court Final Decision, Original Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grounds of detention under section 8(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978, against the detenu are vague and fall within the definitions of 'public order' and 'security of the State'.
- 2 Whether the detention order can rely on both 'security of the State' and 'maintenance of public order' when the order specified only 'public order'.
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds mentioned for the detention did not fall within the statutory meaning of 'acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State'. The order of detention was made only with reference to 'public order', and the supporting grounds referred to both 'public order' and 'security of the State', rendering the detention order illegal.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; detention order quashed.
Orders
- The detenu Shabir Ahmed Shah is to be released forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment