B. VISWANATHIAH AND COMPANY AND ORS. versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
Entry 52 of List I covers only the process of manufacture or production of the industry once Parliament declares control. State legislation on raw materials and the distribution of industry products remains valid unless repugnant to a Central Act. The Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act amendments regulate distribution and supply, not manufacturing or production, and are not repugnant to the Central Silk Boards Act, thus the State Legislature was competent.
- Parties
- Appellant/petitioner: B. Viswanathiah and Company and Ors.; Respondent: State of Karnataka and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal and Writ Petition / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals and petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Seventh Schedule, State V. Central Legislative Powers, Controlled Industries, Repugnancy Between State and Central Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. Viswanathiah and Company and Ors.
Appellant/petitioner
State of Karnataka and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal and Writ Petition / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Legislature was competent to enact amendments to the Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1959 after the enactment of the Central Silk Boards Act, 1948, containing a declaration under Entry 52 of List I.
- 2 Whether the Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act, as amended, is repugnant to the Central Silk Boards Act, 1948.
Ratio Decidendi
Entry 52 of List I covers only the process of manufacture or production of the industry once Parliament declares control. State legislation on raw materials and the distribution of industry products remains valid unless repugnant to a Central Act. The Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act amendments regulate distribution and supply, not manufacturing or production, and are not repugnant to the Central Silk Boards Act, thus the State Legislature was competent.
Court Disposition
appeals and petitions dismissed
Orders
- No orders regarding costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment