T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION AND ORS. ETC. versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC
Supreme Court issued directions clarifying and continuing earlier orders on fee fixation and admission guidelines for private professional colleges, pending evolution of a comprehensive, realistic fee structure by responsible authorities; court extended previous fee structures and directed statutory bodies and governments to urgently formulate and implement appropriate fee schemes.
- Parties
- Petitioner: T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. Etc.; Respondent: State of Karnataka and Ors. Etc.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (c) No. 317 of 1993 Etc. Etc. / Interlocutory Applications Nos. 24, 41 A, 43 49 and 51 65
- Outcome
- Petition disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Private Professional Colleges, Admission Process, Fee Fixation, Guidelines Clarification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. Etc.
Petitioner
State of Karnataka and Ors. Etc.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (c) No. 317 of 1993 Etc. Etc. / Interlocutory Applications Nos. 24, 41 A, 43 49 and 51 65
Legal Issues
- 1 Fee structure in private professional colleges
- 2 Admission guidelines implementation
- 3 Role of statutory bodies and government authorities in fee fixation
Ratio Decidendi
Supreme Court issued directions clarifying and continuing earlier orders on fee fixation and admission guidelines for private professional colleges, pending evolution of a comprehensive, realistic fee structure by responsible authorities; court extended previous fee structures and directed statutory bodies and governments to urgently formulate and implement appropriate fee schemes.
Court Disposition
Petition disposed of
Orders
- Fee fixed for each academic year (1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96) confined to respective year.
- Fee structure and directions from Order dated August 11, 1995 applicable for Academic Year 1996-97.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment