STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. versus GANPATHI CHAYA NAIK & ORS.
Claims for regularization or absorption by daily wage employees not recruited in accordance with Recruitment Rules are unsustainable; mere continuance in service does not confer entitlement to regularization or permanent appointment unless the original appointment followed due process.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Karnataka & Ors.; Respondent: Ganpathi Chaya Naik & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Regularization, Absorption, Public Employment, Daily Wagers, Recruitment Rules, Articles 14 and 16, Industrial Disputes Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Karnataka & Ors.
Appellant
Ganpathi Chaya Naik & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether daily wage employees in continuous service for more than ten years are entitled to regularization or absorption when not recruited as per Recruitment Rules
- 2 Permissibility of raising new plea regarding rights under the Industrial Disputes Act before the Supreme Court
Ratio Decidendi
Claims for regularization or absorption by daily wage employees not recruited in accordance with Recruitment Rules are unsustainable; mere continuance in service does not confer entitlement to regularization or permanent appointment unless the original appointment followed due process.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Orders passed by the High Court and Karnataka Administrative Tribunal set aside.
- Respondents may approach appropriate forum under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 if such remedy and right is available.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment