STATE OF KARNATAKA versus K. KRISHNAN

The High Court's order modifying the requirement of bank guarantee to sureties for interim release of vehicle seized under the Karnataka Forest Act was contrary to law; vehicles seized for forest offences should normally not be released till culmination of all proceedings, and if released for exceptional reasons,...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Appellant: State of Karnataka; Respondent: K. Krishnan
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 17 August 2000
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Karnataka High Court in Crl.p. No. 2852 of 1999
Outcome: Appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Seizure and Release of Vehicles, Confiscation Proceedings, Interim Custody, Section 482 Cr.p.c., Karnataka Forest Act Enforcement

Criminal Law Forestry Law Seizure and Release of Vehicles Confiscation Proceedings Interim Custody Section 482 Cr.p.c. Karnataka Forest Act Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

State of Karnataka

Appellant

K. Krishnan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Karnataka High Court in Crl.p. No. 2852 of 1999

Legal Issues

1 Whether the High Court was correct in modifying the Authorized Officer's order to substitute bank guarantee with sureties for interim release of vehicle allegedly involved in forest offence
2 Proper conditions for interim release of vehicle seized under Karnataka Forest Act
3 Compliance requirements under Karnataka Forest Act for release of seized property

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

Order of High Court dated 11.10.99 is set aside

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.