N. MOHANAN versus STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
Appointment by interim order does not create any right nor entitle the petitioner to regularisation; mere inclusion in the select panel is at best eligibility and does not confer an indefeasible right to appointment in the absence of specific rules. The High Court rightly held appointment could not be regularised after panel cancellation and fresh notification.
- Parties
- Petitioner: N. Mohanan; Respondent: State of Kerala and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From Kerala High Court Judgment Dated 22.11.96 in O.p. No. 13328 of 1992
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Select List, Regularisation of Appointment, Recruitment by Transfer, Kerala Secretariat Subordinate Service Special Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N. Mohanan
Petitioner
State of Kerala and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From Kerala High Court Judgment Dated 22.11.96 in O.p. No. 13328 of 1992
Legal Issues
- 1 Does inclusion of a candidate's name in the select list confer a right to appointment?
- 2 Can an appointment made pursuant to an interim Court order be regularised despite the cancellation of the panel?
Ratio Decidendi
Appointment by interim order does not create any right nor entitle the petitioner to regularisation; mere inclusion in the select panel is at best eligibility and does not confer an indefeasible right to appointment in the absence of specific rules. The High Court rightly held appointment could not be regularised after panel cancellation and fresh notification.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed.
Orders
- Special leave petition is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment