KAILASH versus ST ATE OF M.P.
Conviction under Section 302 IPC is not justified as death was caused by a single blow in a sudden provocation and without premeditation; conviction altered to Section 304, Part II IPC; seven years rigorous imprisonment imposed.
- Parties
- Appellant/accused: Kailash; Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment and Final Order
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Indian Penal Code Sections 300, 302, 304 Part II, Appreciation of Evidence, Inconsistency Between Medical and Ocular Evidence, Right of Private Defence Exception 4 to Section 300
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kailash
Appellant/accused
State of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment and Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under Section 302 IPC is justified when death was caused by a single blow in the course of a sudden quarrel
- 2 Effect of inconsistency between oral and medical evidence
- 3 Whether the facts establish right of private defence
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under Section 302 IPC is not justified as death was caused by a single blow in a sudden provocation and without premeditation; conviction altered to Section 304, Part II IPC; seven years rigorous imprisonment imposed.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Conviction under Section 302 IPC altered to Section 304, Part II IPC
- Appellant sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment