TULSI RAM versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

TULSI RAM versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Rule 9A must be read in harmony with section 13(2): 'immediately' requires reasonable despatch not instant transmission and failure to comply does not automatically vitiate prosecution unless prejudice is shown; accordingly an 18-day delay in forwarding the Public Analyst's report did not vitiate the trial in this case. Separately, mixing cotton seed oil with soyabean oil falls within the prohibition of Rule 44(e) and amounts to adulteration attracting conviction under section 16(1)(a)(i).

Parties
Petitioner: Tulsi Ram; Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 October 1984
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition / Special Leave Petition Under Article 136 (appeal From Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Outcome
Special leave petition dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Legal Topics
Rule 9 a Interpretation, Section 13(2) Rights and Procedure, Delay and Prejudice, Definition of Adulteration, Rule 44(e) Prohibition on Sale of Mixed Edible Oils
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Criminal Law Food Safety Statutory Interpretation Rule 9 a Interpretation Section 13(2) Rights and Procedure Delay and Prejudice Definition of Adulteration +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tulsi Ram

Petitioner

State of Madhya Pradesh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition / Special Leave Petition Under Article 136 (appeal From Madhya Pradesh High Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Meaning of the word 'immediately' in Rule 9A of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules
  2. 2 Whether an 18-day delay in forwarding the Public Analyst's report vitiates the trial
  3. 3 Whether mixing cotton seed oil with soyabean oil constitutes adulteration of soyabean oil under the Act

Ratio Decidendi

Rule 9A must be read in harmony with section 13(2): 'immediately' requires reasonable despatch not instant transmission and failure to comply does not automatically vitiate prosecution unless prejudice is shown; accordingly an 18-day delay in forwarding the Public Analyst's report did not vitiate the trial in this case. Separately, mixing cotton seed oil with soyabean oil falls within the prohibition of Rule 44(e) and amounts to adulteration attracting conviction under section 16(1)(a)(i).

Court Disposition

Special leave petition dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld

Orders

  • Special leave petition dismissed.
  • Conviction under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act upheld.