STTE OF MADHYA PRADESH versus SHANKER LAL & ORS.
The State Government under Section 94(7) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961, has the power to transfer not only the officers specifically enumerated in sub-sections (1) and (2) but also other officers and servants appointed by Municipal Councils, which includes teachers and lecturers of municipal schools. These employees are also considered officers and servants of the Councils.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Madhya Pradesh; Respondents: Shanker Lal & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Decision of Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Municipal Employees, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions, Authority of State Government Over Municipal Employees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Madhya Pradesh
Appellant
Shanker Lal & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Decision of Madhya Pradesh High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Government had the power under Section 94(7) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 to transfer lecturers and teachers employed by Municipal Councils to other Municipal Councils.
Ratio Decidendi
The State Government under Section 94(7) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961, has the power to transfer not only the officers specifically enumerated in sub-sections (1) and (2) but also other officers and servants appointed by Municipal Councils, which includes teachers and lecturers of municipal schools. These employees are also considered officers and servants of the Councils.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment