STATE OF M.P. versus RAMESH AND ANR.
Testimony of PW1 was precise, concise, specific, vivid, and corroborated by circumstances, other witness statements, and medical evidence. High Court ignored material incriminating evidence, resulting in a perverse finding. Trial court's conviction restored.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Madhya Pradesh; Respondent No.1: Ramesh; Respondent No.2: Bhaggo Bai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Acquittal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; trial court conviction restored.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Appreciation of Evidence, Child Witness, Appeal Against Acquittal, Section 302 IPC, Res Gestae, Adverse Inference From Accused's Silence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Madhya Pradesh
Appellant
Ramesh
Respondent No.1
Bhaggo Bai
Respondent No.2
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testimony of the child witness (PW1) is reliable and sufficient for conviction
- 2 Whether the High Court's acquittal was perverse and contrary to evidence
- 3 Scope of appellate court power in criminal appeals against acquittal
Ratio Decidendi
Testimony of PW1 was precise, concise, specific, vivid, and corroborated by circumstances, other witness statements, and medical evidence. High Court ignored material incriminating evidence, resulting in a perverse finding. Trial court's conviction restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; trial court conviction restored.
Orders
- High Court judgment dated 31.3.2004 set aside
- Trial Court conviction dated 16.8.1996 under section 302 IPC restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment