STATE OF M.P. & ORS. versus PARVEZ KHAN
Refusal to recruit the candidate by the competent authority was justified as the respondent, despite acquittal or discharge, could not be presumed to be fully exonerated. Candidates with criminal antecedents are not fit to enter police service, and the doctrine of equality under Article 14 does not apply in such cases.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.; Respondent: Parvez Khan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, Writ Appeal No. 262 of 2010
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compassionate Appointment, Police Recruitment, Criminal Antecedents, Doctrine of Equality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Appellant
Parvez Khan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, Writ Appeal No. 262 of 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal of compassionate appointment in police service on the ground of criminal antecedents of candidate who was acquitted for want of evidence or discharged due to compounding is justified
Ratio Decidendi
Refusal to recruit the candidate by the competent authority was justified as the respondent, despite acquittal or discharge, could not be presumed to be fully exonerated. Candidates with criminal antecedents are not fit to enter police service, and the doctrine of equality under Article 14 does not apply in such cases.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of Division Bench set aside
- Claim for recruitment of respondent by way of compassionate appointment rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment