STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. versus ANAND MOHAN &ANR.
The Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Government of Madhya Pradesh, was competent to grant sanction for prosecution since February 1988 via rules amendment and subsequent orders, and there is no infirmity in the sanction granted for offences allegedly committed in 1997; the High Court erred in holding otherwise.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Madhya Pradesh; Respondent: Anand Mohan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 03.09.2013 in W.p. No. 21246 of 2012
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sanction for Prosecution, Competency of Authority, Delegation of Power, Prevention of Corruption Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Madhya Pradesh
Appellant
Anand Mohan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 03.09.2013 in W.p. No. 21246 of 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Which department of the State Government is competent to grant sanction for prosecution under Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988?
- 2 Whether the Department of Law and Legislative Affairs had the authority to grant sanction for prosecution in respect of offences committed in 1997?
Ratio Decidendi
The Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Government of Madhya Pradesh, was competent to grant sanction for prosecution since February 1988 via rules amendment and subsequent orders, and there is no infirmity in the sanction granted for offences allegedly committed in 1997; the High Court erred in holding otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment and order dated 03.09.2013 of the High Court set aside
- Sanction granted by Department of Law and Legislative Affairs dated 20.11.2012 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment