VASANTA SAMPAT DUPARE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VASANTA SAMPAT DUPARE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

The extreme depravity and barbaric manner in which the crime was committed, especially the rape and murder of a helpless child by an individual who had gained her trust, clearly outweigh any mitigating circumstances including potential for reformation. The principles laid down in Bachan Singh were correctly applied; no procedural or substantive ground was established to interfere with the death sentence. The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed.

Parties
Petitioner: Vasanta Sampat Dupare; Respondent: State of Maharashtra
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Review Petition (crl.) Nos. 637 638 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 2486 2487 of 2014 / Review of Supreme Court Decision Affirming Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Review petitions dismissed; conviction and death sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Death Sentence, Sentencing, Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances, Rape and Murder of Minor, Section 235(2) Cr PC
Criminal Law Death Sentence Sentencing Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances Rape and Murder of Minor Section 235(2) Cr PC

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vasanta Sampat Dupare

Petitioner

State of Maharashtra

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Petition (crl.) Nos. 637 638 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 2486 2487 of 2014 / Review of Supreme Court Decision Affirming Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances for imposition of death sentence
  2. 2 Whether the principles laid down in Bachan Singh regarding mitigating factors and sentencing hearing were properly followed
  3. 3 Whether lack of separate sentencing hearing vitiates the trial under Section 235(2) CrPC

Ratio Decidendi

The extreme depravity and barbaric manner in which the crime was committed, especially the rape and murder of a helpless child by an individual who had gained her trust, clearly outweigh any mitigating circumstances including potential for reformation. The principles laid down in Bachan Singh were correctly applied; no procedural or substantive ground was established to interfere with the death sentence. The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed.

Court Disposition

Review petitions dismissed; conviction and death sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • No interference with the Supreme Court's order of death sentence; Review petitions are dismissed.