JAGANNATH SONU PARKAR versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

JAGANNATH SONU PARKAR versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

The amended Section 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is valid and does not contravene Article 14. The Government notification constituting a Special Magistrate and fixing the venue for trial is within statutory powers and does not amount to discrimination, as both places involved in allegations are within the Magistrate's jurisdiction. Differences in appellate routes arise from statutory provisions and not from unequal executive action.

Parties
Petitioner: Jagannath Sonu Parkar; Respondent: State of Maharashtra
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 October 1962
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction, Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed.
Legal Topics
Special Judicial Magistrates, Discrimination Under Article 14, Venue of Trial, Government Notifications, Code of Criminal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jagannath Sonu Parkar

Petitioner

State of Maharashtra

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition Under Article 32 / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction, Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the amended Section 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (as amended by Bombay Act 23 of 1951), and the Notification dated December 29, 1961, infringe Article 14 of the Constitution by constituting a Special Judicial Magistrate for a particular case and area.
  2. 2 Whether the change in venue and appeal process arising from the notification amounts to discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The amended Section 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is valid and does not contravene Article 14. The Government notification constituting a Special Magistrate and fixing the venue for trial is within statutory powers and does not amount to discrimination, as both places involved in allegations are within the Magistrate's jurisdiction. Differences in appellate routes arise from statutory provisions and not from unequal executive action.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed.

Orders

  • Petition dismissed.