STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus KASHIRAO AND ORS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus KASHIRAO AND ORS.

Evidence of prosecution witnesses was cogent and credible; the accused, armed with deadly weapons, acted with a common object in an unlawful assembly and inflicted fatal and grievous injuries. Section 149 IPC is applicable even if the intended victim (PW-1) was not actually killed. The trial court's conviction under...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: State of Maharashtra; Respondents: Kashirao and others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of High Court set aside; trial court conviction and sentence restored.
Legal Topics
Unlawful Assembly, Murder, Attempt to Murder, Common Object, Common Intention, Transfer of Malice
Criminal Law Unlawful Assembly Murder Attempt to Murder Common Object Common Intention Transfer of Malice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Maharashtra

Appellant

Kashirao and others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether evidence of eye-witnesses and applicability of Section 149 IPC was properly evaluated by the High Court
  2. 2 Whether conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC was justified
  3. 3 Distinction between common object and common intention in context of unlawful assembly

Ratio Decidendi

Evidence of prosecution witnesses was cogent and credible; the accused, armed with deadly weapons, acted with a common object in an unlawful assembly and inflicted fatal and grievous injuries. Section 149 IPC is applicable even if the intended victim (PW-1) was not actually killed. The trial court's conviction under Section 302, 307, 147, 148, 452 r/w Section 149 IPC was correct, and High Court erred in reducing conviction to Section 326. The doctrine of transfer of malice under Section 301 IPC applies and does not exclude liability under Section 149 IPC in these facts.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of High Court set aside; trial court conviction and sentence restored.

Orders

  • Respondents to surrender to custody and serve balance sentence.
  • Restoration of trial court conviction under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 452 r/w Section 149 IPC.