STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus RATTANLAL

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus RATTANLAL

The Commissioner, including the Additional Commissioner, has jurisdiction to initiate suo motu revisional proceedings even after an appellate order under Section 21 has become final if fraud or suppression of material facts is discovered thereafter; the limitation period starts only from the date of discovery, and such exercise of power is not barred by previous orders.

Parties
Appellant: State of Maharashtra; Respondent: Rattanlal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 December 1992
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Bombay High Court in W.p. No. 1903 of 1980
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Revisional Powers Under Ceiling Laws, Jurisdiction of Commissioner, Suppression of Material Facts, Limitation Period for Revisional Exercise
Land Law Administrative Law Revisional Powers Under Ceiling Laws Jurisdiction of Commissioner Suppression of Material Facts Limitation Period for Revisional Exercise

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Maharashtra

Appellant

Rattanlal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Bombay High Court in W.p. No. 1903 of 1980

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Commissioner or State Government had jurisdiction to reopen determination of surplus area under Section 17 after appellate order became final
  2. 2 Extent and nature of suo motu revisional powers under Section 45 of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling and Holdings) Act, 1961

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner, including the Additional Commissioner, has jurisdiction to initiate suo motu revisional proceedings even after an appellate order under Section 21 has become final if fraud or suppression of material facts is discovered thereafter; the limitation period starts only from the date of discovery, and such exercise of power is not barred by previous orders.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of High Court set aside
  • Order of Commissioner restored