STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. versus ANEES KHAN
Since the workman neither reported for duty nor enforced his reinstatement order, he is not entitled to back wages for the period in question; his conduct establishes abandonment of the claim.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of M.P. and Ors.; Respondent: Anees Khan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Back Wages, Reinstatement, Industrial Dispute, Abandonment of Claim
Labour Law Back Wages Reinstatement Industrial Dispute Abandonment of Claim
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
State of M.P. and Ors.
Appellant
Anees Khan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the workman entitled to back wages for the period 08.02.1994 to 31.03.2001 despite not reporting for duty or taking steps to enforce the reinstatement order?
- 2 Does the respondent's conduct amount to abandonment of claim for reinstatement and disqualify him from further relief?
Ratio Decidendi
Since the workman neither reported for duty nor enforced his reinstatement order, he is not entitled to back wages for the period in question; his conduct establishes abandonment of the claim.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The workman is not entitled to back wages for the period 08.02.1994 to 31.03.2001.
- State is directed to pay Rs. 1 lac to the workman within three months from receipt of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment