STATE OF M.P. versus SURESH GUPTA AND ANR.

STATE OF M.P. versus SURESH GUPTA AND ANR.

Courts below are to decide all pending or connected matters on their merits, uninfluenced by findings of the High Court in its impugned order.

Parties
Appellant: STATE OF M.P.; Respondent: Suresh Gupta; Respondent: Sadhvi Rithambara; Respondent: B.K. Satija; Respondent: Vipin Gogia; Respondent: S.K. Jain; Respondent: A.P. Dhamija; Respondent: P.R. Jain; Respondent: Vivek Gambhir; Respondent: Anil Kumar; Respondent: S.K. Gambhir; Respondent: K.G. Maheshwari
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
08 September 1995
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Disposal by Supreme Court
Outcome
appeal disposed of
Legal Topics
Disposal of Pending Cases, Influence of Prior Findings
Criminal Law Disposal of Pending Cases Influence of Prior Findings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

STATE OF M.P.

Appellant

Suresh Gupta

Respondent

Sadhvi Rithambara

Respondent

B.K. Satija

Respondent

Vipin Gogia

Respondent

S.K. Jain

Respondent

A.P. Dhamija

Respondent

P.R. Jain

Respondent

Vivek Gambhir

Respondent

Anil Kumar

Respondent

S.K. Gambhir

Respondent

K.G. Maheshwari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Disposal by Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should courts below dispose pending cases uninfluenced by High Court's findings in impugned order?

Ratio Decidendi

Courts below are to decide all pending or connected matters on their merits, uninfluenced by findings of the High Court in its impugned order.

Court Disposition

appeal disposed of

Orders

  • Courts below are to dispose of all pending or connected matters between the parties on merits, uninfluenced by any findings and observations made by the High Court in the impugned order.
  • Appeal disposed of accordingly.