KUMARI N. VASUNDARA versus STATE OF MYSORE & ANR.
Rule 3 is not unconstitutional as the petitioner failed to show the requirement of residing in Mysore for ten years is so unreasonable as to be arbitrary or lack substantial basis; proper classification for imparting medical education to candidates likely to serve residents is permissible and does not violate Article 14.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Kumari N. Vasundara; Respondent: State of Mysore; Respondent: S. P. Nayar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 1971
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Equality, Admission Criteria for Medical Colleges, Classification Based on Residence and Domicile
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kumari N. Vasundara
Petitioner
State of Mysore
Respondent
S. P. Nayar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Constitutional validity of Rule 3 of the Rules for Selection of candidates for admission to Pre-Professional course leading to M.B.B.S. in Government Medical Colleges, Mysore
- 2 Whether imposing a ten-year residence requirement in addition to domicile violates Article 14
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 3 is not unconstitutional as the petitioner failed to show the requirement of residing in Mysore for ten years is so unreasonable as to be arbitrary or lack substantial basis; proper classification for imparting medical education to candidates likely to serve residents is permissible and does not violate Article 14.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition dismissed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment