STATE OF MYSORE & ANR. versus M. M. THAMMAIAH & ANR.
Rule 10 of the Rules for Classifiers does not constitute an express order reserving the right of the State Government to the trees growing on Bane lands within the meaning of section 75(1) of the Mysore Land Revenue Act, 1964; it is merely administrative guidance for classifiers and at best references a historical fact, not an explicit reservation of rights.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Mysore; Appellant: Divisional Forest Officer, South Coorg Division, Hunsur, Mysore; Respondent: M. M. Thammaiah; Respondent: B. M. Karyappa; Intervener: G. B. Pai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision Under Article 133(1)(b) of the Constitution
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Statutory Rules, Rights to Forest Produce on Bane Lands, Validity of Rules Under Mysore Forest Act, Reservation of Rights by Government
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Mysore
Appellant
Divisional Forest Officer, South Coorg Division, Hunsur, Mysore
Appellant
M. M. Thammaiah
Respondent
B. M. Karyappa
Respondent
G. B. Pai
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision Under Article 133(1)(b) of the Constitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 10 of the Rules for Classifiers contains an express order reserving the right of the State Government to trees on Bane lands within Section 75(1) of Mysore Land Revenue Act, 1964
- 2 Whether Rule 137 of the Mysore Forest Rules, 1969, is inconsistent with Section 75(1) of Mysore Land Revenue Act, 1964 and violates Articles 19(1)(f) and 31 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 10 of the Rules for Classifiers does not constitute an express order reserving the right of the State Government to the trees growing on Bane lands within the meaning of section 75(1) of the Mysore Land Revenue Act, 1964; it is merely administrative guidance for classifiers and at best references a historical fact, not an explicit reservation of rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court on the construction of Rule 10 set aside.
- Parties remitted to such further remedies as they may be advised to take.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment